Crime and criminal justice statistics by ethnicity
Official England and Wales evidence on arrests and court outcomes, with the unknown records and interpretation limits kept visible.
Arrests by self-defined ethnicity
Year ending 31 March 2026. The percentages are shares of arrests where ethnicity was recorded. Arrests are not convictions, population arrest rates or proof that an offence occurred.
Convictions use a different dataset
For indictable offences in 2024, the Ministry of Justice reported similar group shares for prosecutions and convictions where ethnicity was known.
Ethnicity was not stated or was unknown for one-third of defendants in the relevant 2024 data. Percentages among known cases must not be presented as shares of every defendant.
Top five offence groups within each recorded ethnicity
This is the specific breakdown missing from the nationality view. Each list ranks the offence mix within one recorded ethnic group; it does not compare population offending rates.
Asian
ethnic group- Drug offences28%
- Other offences20%
- Violence against the person19%
- Theft offences14%
- Miscellaneous crimes against society13%
Not in the top five: sexual offences (7%).
Black
ethnic group- Drug offences29%
- Other offences24%
- Theft offences18%
- Violence against the person18%
- Miscellaneous crimes against society7%
Not in the top five: sexual offences (4%).
Mixed
ethnic group- Drug offences25%
- Theft offences24%
- Other offences21%
- Violence against the person21%
- Miscellaneous crimes against society7%
Not in the top five: sexual offences (2%).
Other
ethnic group- Theft offences27%
- Drug offences22%
- Other offences20%
- Violence against the person18%
- Miscellaneous crimes against society9%
Not in the top five: sexual offences (4%).
White
ethnic group- Theft offences31%
- Violence against the person23%
- Other offences18%
- Drug offences15%
- Miscellaneous crimes against society9%
Not in the top five: sexual offences (4%).
What adjusted analysis changes
Raw outcome differences can reflect age, sex, offence mix, plea and offending history. The Ministry of Justice’s 2020–2024 sentencing analysis used 640,416 records after excluding cases with missing court or demographic information.
of the original analysis sample was excluded for missing information. The publication says there was no consistent five-year pattern of significant custody differences by ethnicity, though some latest-year group associations remained.
Use these figures responsibly
Do not label arrests as crimes committed
An arrest is a police power applied to a person; it does not establish guilt.
Do not calculate a rate without a matching denominator
A defensible rate needs a population aligned by geography, period and age. The composition of force areas and police activity also matters.
Do not infer causes from group differences
These descriptive tables do not isolate discrimination, offending behaviour, deprivation, geography or operational policing.
Keep source ethnicity definitions visible
Arrest data uses self-defined ethnicity; officer-observed categories and court datasets have different coverage and groupings.
Read the full Ministry of Justice analysisRelated crime and demographic evidence
Each page uses a different population, reference period and statistical unit. Keep those definitions attached when moving between them.